Loading... Please wait...![]() |
|
||
| Measurements in mm | Product Details | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thickness | 0.05 | Material | Polyurethane (non-latex) |
| Length | 170 | Texture | Smooth |
| Head Width | 79 | Lubricated | Yes |
| Shaft Width | 79 | Spermicidal | No |
| Base Width | 79 | Reservoir Tip | No |
Posted by Unknown on 27th Mar 2011
Interesting concept, but actual use leaves a lot to be desired... the condom had a tendency to either go completely in, or get yanked out by friction. Also had a lousy sensation because it's so loose. I guess it might be applicable if you have a latex allergy...
Posted by Unknown on 27th Mar 2011
One of the absolute worst condoms ever invented.
It's fantastic if you like having sex with a plastic bag... Theses things are a huge waste of money.
Posted by Unknown on 27th Mar 2011
FC is a great idea. Latex irritates me, so polyurethane is a better alternative. In addition, my partner really liked it because it didn't constrict him the way male condoms do. Only downside is the price, but I think it's well worth it.